NYT asks, are female athletes attractive?
9 April 2010
Un-fu¢king-believable. The New York Times writes about Brittney Griner, a 6-foot-8 female basketball star at Baylor University, simply in terms of her attractiveness. How does the author, Guy Trebay, make this into a news item? By celebrating how female athletes are expanding our ideas about feminine beauty! Yay, feminism! Let’s look at his tally of feminist triumphs via women’s sports:
Feminine beauty ideals have shifted with amazing velocity over the last several decades, in no realm more starkly than sports. Muscular athleticism of a sort that once raised eyebrows is now commonplace. Partly this can be credited to the presence on the sports scene of Amazonian wonders like the Williams sisters, statuesque goddesses like Maria Sharapova, Misty May Treanor and Kerri Walsh, sinewy running machines like Paula Radcliffe or thick-thighed soccer dynamos like Mia Hamm.
Now that you put it in such a sensitive manner, Trebay, I see more clearly how much women have succeeded in making thick thighs and an “Amazonian” physical presence completely mainstream.
Clearly, when presented with the topic of female athletes, our sole question should be: am I attracted to them? And thanks to Trebay, we know the answer is yes. Never mind that Griner has an “attenuated Gumby torso, coltish legs and tomboy features,” he attests; she’s gorgeous! And he quotes a lot of model casting agents, stylists, and scouts to confirm that fact.
Thus, with our coltish legs and thick thighs, we resolutely take 10 big steps backward. And I thought it was cool that Griner can dunk.